A state without capital in 1956

Andhra was accused and has been constantly remarked as a new state with no capital city. It used to have its capital in Tents. Telengana leaders were gracious enough to share the 400 year old Hyderabad city. It was based on mutual understanding that a new state was formed called Andhra Pradesh. 56 years later one region started accusing the other region of treachery. It was right that Andhra did not have capital, but in the 56 years of new state, if the Andhra region has done the treachery, as blamed by Telengana, Is it not supposed to have big buildings, and big cities, which are good to be capital city. Unfortunately, that's not the case.

On the contrary, the current capital city, along with the Rangareddy district contributes to 65% of the total state Revenue. How is that Andhra's fault.

Who made Kiran Kumar Reddy and Rosayya and other congress chief ministers - High command

First promise to be broken in United Andhra Pradesh - Not appointing Dy. CM.

Who made the first irresponsible statement in the state of Andhra Pradesh (if made in public meeting) - Nehru - about natkat and masoom.

If nehru was so concerned and made that statement in public meeting, why did he not make sure that Dy.CM be given to Telengana or made sure that the masoom had power, by appointing a Telengana CM.

First chief minister to complete total 5 years ruling in andhra pradesh - shri Kasu Brahmananda Reddy

Second chief minister to complete total 5 years - Shri Jalgam Vengal Rao

Third chief minister to complete total 5 years single Hand- Shri Taraka Rama Rao.

Fourth chief minister to complete total 5 years single hand- Shri Nara Chandra Babu Naidu

Fifth and final chief minister to complete total 5 years single hand - YSR

What is the point in arguing that no Telengana chief minister was allowed to rule the state for the full term.

If Nehru was soo concerned about the masoomiath of Telengana, why did he not make sure that "Pedda manushula oppandam" is strictly followed and Telengana person was not made a Deputy Minister, if not a chief minister.

The very basis of merger. CONDITIONAL should be opposed. We are all indians, and india has been divided into different states based on criteria. Its unfortunate to make a state based on conditions. Congress not just made conditions, but went ahead and raised a sense of doubt among telenganites, by bringing this massomiat into mix.

Conditions should not have been imposed, instead a thorough study should have been conducted to identify, the living standards of the main resource of a state, the people. Made sure that the disparities are properly handled and enough measures are taken to develop the whole state into one powerful region.

Don't we think, its unfortunate, for congress MLA's to go ahead and suggest central government to give a 25,000 crores to andhra region to develop their own capital.

how can we justify that thought process. If a state is to be divided as "Anna Dammulu", why is the peddamanisi who came in, to arbitrate paying 25,000 crores, even if its sufficient.

The important issues Telengana would have once formed is Trust issues.
By TRUST issue, I mean

1. Farmers will ask for water availability. It is understood, that even if Telengana wants to build all the irrigation projects like model state, its not going to be immediate possibility. Andhra will always have disputes, like andhra pradesh has with karnataka.

2. Students will constantly ring the employment bells. Andhra employers, will be forced to show more clearer disparity between regions, when employing new employees.

I would say the minimum adjustment period will be about 10 years. On the other end, andhra leaders are not promising anything in the new andhra state. They will make sure that people understand that they are deceived of funds, and everything they own. Which is positive sign, as they will be at the state of having only 60% of the total revenue they need to function. It will be a big boost, to make it even, if proper leadership is elected.